Bonus disputes

We help employers put in place bonus plans that will help motivate employees and directors to deliver. Experience in dealing with employees helps us understand where the employer could be vulnerable when faced with bonus disputes.

Bonus disputes are an interesting area in that there is a crossover between contract law and employment law. There can be complications for employers in that it is possible for there to have been no breach of the terms of the employment contract but still to have acted unlawfully in employment law terms. For example, by way of sex discrimination or in other ways.

Based on questions we are most frequently asked by employers we have explained:

  • Structure of a cash bonus;
  • Share based bonuses;
  • Claims employers want to avoid.

Cash bonuses

A bonus can be contractual or discretionary or a combination of both.  Discretion provides an employer with more latitude.

Fair calculation of the bonus targets

Many bonuses are based on hitting targets measured against the accounts.  The question arises, how are the revenues and targets to be actually measured?

Bonus payments can be measured against the performance of shares and a range of valuation methods can be deployed.  This type of bonus is often called a phantom option but as real shares are not used it is not actually an option over shares.

Common problem area for employers with bonus targets

Many challenges succeed when the financials are picked over.  Therefore the employer needs to think through the structure of the bonus before it is presented.  Attempts to over complicate can in our experience back fire.  And, if an employer tries to change the bonus the employer could face employment law problems and be found to have repudiated the employment contract with the result that the restrictive covenants are unenforceable.  Further details on claims employees can make are explained below.

Fair exercise of discretion

An employer’s discretion must be fairly exercised.  What is fair is open to interpretation based on the facts.

Fairness depends upon not only the rules of the bonus plan. Consideration is required as to how the discretion has been applied for any particular employee.  The courts will take into account how others were treated.  Employers must keep detailed minutes justifying decisions as these can be the vital evidence needed in dealing with a bonus complaint.

  • The terms “absolute”, “sole”, and “reasonable” use of discretion are subtly different and yield different interpretations in practice.

Share based bonuses

Shareholder approval

The employer may need shareholder approval to issue the shares.  A review of the articles and shareholders agreement is also recommended.

Compulsory transfers

In many private companies it is the intention that the employee is required to transfer shares on cessation of employment for any reason. There are protections which can be put in place.  Protections are not automatic and do require negotiation.


Most employee options will lapse on cessation of employment for any reason. But the employer does need to draft such requirements and include appropriately worded waiver of liability clauses.

Claims employers want to avoid

Employees have the following heads of claim to consider as a way to being paid what they think is a fair bonus.

  • Damages for the employer’s breach of contract which bring an end to post termination restrictions;
  • Wrongful dismissal;
  • Unlawful deductions from wages;
  • Unfair dismissal;
  • Discrimination which includes equal pay claims.

Providing information about the bonus to the employee

Extracting information from an employer concerning their decisions on bonus payments is often the stumbling block for employees. Employers naturally want to make it hard for employees and there are ways this can be achieved.

If the employee believes discrimination is in play can serve a questionnaire on the employer.  Discrimination questionnaires will often  can be served by employees alongside a grievance.

Refusal to co-operate

Employers can be penalised for not co-operating and or being unreasonable.  The way employers can be penalised differs depending upon which court hears the case.

We do see cases settle shortly before the deadline for any order for disclosure made by the court.

Related Posts